Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Digital Art / Professional Member Lorem IpsumMale/Unknown Group :iconanimationteamcedim: AnimationTeamCedim
 
Recent Activity
Deviant for 10 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 2,114 Deviations 7,258 Comments 25,622 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Random Favourites

Critiques

Crashing by Leiika
by Leiika

This scene is esthetically pleasing. I'm guessing it was generated by Mandelbulb or similar software, as it appears to be a fractal. So...

HT - LTCV 38 Backstop by Headdie
by Headdie

Very nicely done. At first blush, though, I question the basic assumption behind this work. Large, heavy machines are very vulnerable, ...

Chill mother by iorguDesign

For such a simple piece, this drawing demonstrates an astonishing degree of mastery. Every stroke tells a tale. Nothing could be added ...

Activity


How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.   
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, ....

        from Sonnets from the Portuguese
Elizabeth Barrett Browning (1806-1861)

How do I love the artwork of Rene Wiley?  Let me count the ways...

renewileygallery.com/

She is practically my neighbor, having a studio/gallery in my adopted home town.   I walk past it regularly, and sometimes stop in to see what is new.   I don't think I've met Rene herself, though I've met her husband and her daughter (married, and an artist in her own right) when they were minding the studio/gallery. 

Her work is unclassifiable, so far as I can tell.  It is not tediously photorealistic, but neither is it sloppy or amateurish.  None of the conventional labels I know of -- Impressionism, Expressionism, etc -- fits it at all.   It is sui generis.

Any work of hers grabs me in a way no photograph of similar subject matter ever could.    I know that for a fact, because the subjects of many of her works are as familiar as my own back yard.

I like to tell myself that she is showing me, not how the world actually looks, but how it is reconstructed in her mind, improved by the elimination of boring detail.
Nothing important is lost in translation, nothing is distorted,  the essence of things is sharpened and emphasized.     I think it is true to say of her work, as it has been said of others, that it is not abstract, but more real than mere reality.

 

Is there anyone out there to whom that sentence does not sound painfully wrong?

It's quoted from some financial commentator, who shall remain nameless.

It violates one of the basic rules of English grammar, the agreement of subject and verb.  If that isn't clear, perhaps it will help to establish what is the subject of the sentence.

The subject is what the verb asserts something about.  So, what is it that is being said to be at an all-time low?   Is it debts?  No, it's servicing.

It might be confusing that "servicing" looks like a verb, not a noun.  A verb that functions as a noun, as this one does, is called a "gerund" -- a grammarian's term I was taught long after my parents had taught me to speak correct English.   Such terms, and the rules that mention them, are scholars' attempts to explain why correct speech is correct, and why anything else is unacceptable. They attempt to get at the thought processes expressed by correct speech.  If the thinking is muddled, the speech will sound wrong.
Note to myself:  Box2D is the function library on which Angry Birds is (or once was) based.   It's a "physics engine"; i.e. it governs the motion of objects in the game approximately according to real-world physics. I believe it's a free download. If it weren't,  I could probably write such a library myself, but don't care to re-invent the wheel.

Why do I care?  Angry Birds is extremely popular, or was at one time.  The more-or-less realistic behavior of inanimate objects in the game was probably one of many factors favoring success.
Yesterday David McCullough was interviewed by Charlie Rose about his book, The Wright Brothers.  

I gather the book discloses much more of great significance about the Wright brothers than most people know.  There was far more to them than the mere fact that they invented the first steerable heavier-than-air craft, solving the problem that had occupied human minds for millenia, and radically changing the way we all live.   For one thing thing there is the role played in their lives by their sister.   I'd bet you never heard of their sister.

Much more could be said, but I won't say it.   Read the book.   But in the interview, much is made of the fact the the Wright brothers had a father who took great pains to teach them how to use the English language.   And it shows in their writings for publication, and in their correspondence with each other and their sister, the basis of much of the content of the book.

All I can say is, good for them.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_%28f…

The film has been reviewed elsewhere, so there is little I can add to that.   I enjoyed the movie.

Here I will only point out that the software using the handle "Samantha" in the movie is not an "operating system"  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operatin…

"Operating system" is a technical term with a specific meaning, given for example in the Wikipedia article cited above.   It is utterly inappropriate as used in the film "Her".   So why is it used at all? I can only guess that the reason is the usual one -- someone having zero understanding of technical matters thought the term sounded impressive, and so decided to use it, though he/she had no idea what the term means.

This is not the first instance of the term "operating system" leaking into the vernacular with total loss of meaning.   Xfinity has been advertising a product/service it calls the "X1 Operating System".   Actually I haven't investigated it, but nothing in the advertising suggests that it is actually an operating system.  

deviantID

golem1
Lorem Ipsum
Artist | Professional | Digital Art
I claim to be a professional artist, because I have actually sold a few paintings, though none recently.

Favourite genre of music: anything but rock or grand opera. By "rock" I mean any of various contemporary genres, including rap, heavy metal, techno etc, characterized by raucous monotony. I don't include jazz.
Favourite photographer: Ansel Adams
Favourite style of art: abstract (algorithmic or mathematical), not "abstract"
Operating System: Linux, Ubuntu distribution
MP3 player of choice: vlc
Shell of choice: bash (Bourne Again Shell), Python
Wallpaper of choice: Supernova 1994D in Galaxy NGC 4526 (see webcam)
Favourite cartoon character: Calvin (& Hobbes)
Interests

Journal History

How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.   
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, ....

        from Sonnets from the Portuguese
Elizabeth Barrett Browning (1806-1861)

How do I love the artwork of Rene Wiley?  Let me count the ways...

renewileygallery.com/

She is practically my neighbor, having a studio/gallery in my adopted home town.   I walk past it regularly, and sometimes stop in to see what is new.   I don't think I've met Rene herself, though I've met her husband and her daughter (married, and an artist in her own right) when they were minding the studio/gallery. 

Her work is unclassifiable, so far as I can tell.  It is not tediously photorealistic, but neither is it sloppy or amateurish.  None of the conventional labels I know of -- Impressionism, Expressionism, etc -- fits it at all.   It is sui generis.

Any work of hers grabs me in a way no photograph of similar subject matter ever could.    I know that for a fact, because the subjects of many of her works are as familiar as my own back yard.

I like to tell myself that she is showing me, not how the world actually looks, but how it is reconstructed in her mind, improved by the elimination of boring detail.
Nothing important is lost in translation, nothing is distorted,  the essence of things is sharpened and emphasized.     I think it is true to say of her work, as it has been said of others, that it is not abstract, but more real than mere reality.

 

AdCast - Ads from the Community

Groups

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:icongolem1:
golem1 Featured By Owner Apr 28, 2015  Professional Digital Artist
One fan said he enjoyed Shakespeare's plays, but found the dialogue tiresome in that it contained so many old cliches!  The explanation, of course, is that those cliches originated with Shakespeare, and they became cliches because they are so pithy and quotable.

In some quarters it is fashionable to invent a name for one's personal philosophy.   Asked how I see things, I once answered that I would call myself a Methodist, except that the term is already in use and means something other than what I would mean by it.  Indeed, I said that I consider myself to BE a method.   Hence the importance to me of the quotation in my signature line.
Reply
:icongolem1:
golem1 Featured By Owner Apr 28, 2015  Professional Digital Artist
Testing new signature line.
Reply
:iconleiika:
Leiika Featured By Owner Feb 2, 2015
lol I'm using ubuntu as well :)
Reply
:iconleiika:
Leiika Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2014
Thanks for the critique and +watch! I really appreciate it!
Reply
:iconjplafontaine:
JPLafontaine Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2014

Thanks for the Fav ! :) (Smile) 

Reply
:iconmalleni-stock:
Malleni-Stock Featured By Owner Sep 25, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
+fav Thank you ! Have a nice day :wave:
Reply
:icongabo2020:
gabo2020 Featured By Owner Sep 19, 2014  Professional Traditional Artist
Thank you for the :+fav:
Reply
:iconilovepumpkin2014:
ilovepumpkin2014 Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2014
Thanks for the fave!
Reply
:iconstonesorceress:
StoneSorceress Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2014  Professional Filmographer
Welcome by StoneSorceress

welcome to the Stone Sorceress gallery 
please enjoy your visits :D
Reply
:iconpeterbru:
peterbru Featured By Owner Aug 13, 2014
Thanks for the favs... :)
Reply
Add a Comment: